🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.